Office Kitty

Our office cat is really smart.  He has trained me to open the door for him.  Here’s how it usually goes (and just did a few minutes ago).

I call him Pumpernickel Jazzpaws.

I call him Pumpernickel Jazzpaws.

He will walk outside my office and begin to meow.  I walk into the hallway and he makes me open the door to our storage room.  I believe this is his way of making sure I know he wants a door open.  Once I’ve opened that door he will meow at me and begin walking towards the back door.  Our office is located in a house that is zoned for office work.  So we actually have a backyard.  The garage has been converted into a mini warehouse and we have a warehouse manager working in that office; this is where the backdoor is located.  He walks me all the way across the house, meowing and looking over his shoulder to make sure I’m following.  Then he walks to the door, sits down in front of it, and waits for me to open the door.

He does this almost every day.  Since it’s hot in Texas we can’t open it all the time, because we have to leave it open, so there are times when I have to tell him no.  I assume during these times he feels that I’ve forgotten all the training we’ve gone through and that he’s disappointed in me.

It’s funny because he doesn’t ask our warehouse manager to open the door.  Though she’s sitting right there, he walks across the house and finds me.

He will also occasionally walk across the office to get me and make me follow him to the “living room” so that I may pet him there. Seriously.  He will walk into my office, meow his “follow me” meow and plop down in the middle of the floor so that I may pet him.  He is very spoiled.  I also think he believes he is my boss.

Has anyone else been trained by their cats?  Do you have an office pet, and does he run things?

1 Comment

Posted by on August 18, 2014 in Random


Tags: ,

JBT – Paradise Lost

Joe’s Book Tour – John Milton’s Paradise Lost

These next couple books I can’t remember in what order I read them, but I know they were all in High School around the same year.  The first on this list is Paradise Lost.

I was raised Catholic, as I’ve mentioned before, and I read my bible and went to Sunday school and catechism on Wednesday’s in preparation for my Confirmation. Yet, I still base most of my ideas of The Fall, God, Satan, and even Jesus, on what I read in this book.

The impact it had on me came from the moment when Satan decides that he’d “rather rule in hell, than serve in heaven”.  You see there’s a moment when Satan realizes that he could ask God for forgiveness.  Even after all he’s done: waging outright war against God.  God would still forgive him.  That’s how god is (at least in the new testament).  God is all about love and forgiveness.

Yet, Satan knows that even if he were taken back, even if allowed to be at the left-hand of God again, he would just get jealous again.  Satan would want more.  So he decides, because he, like everyone else, has free will, to rule in Hell and see if he can stick it to God by corrupting he’s favorite creation, Humans.

What struck me most is I’d never considered that Satan might just have been an overly-ambitious angel, who just couldn’t admit when he’s wrong.  I’d never considered the idea that he might have regrets.

It’s also funny to think that in 1600 Milton must have known people who make mistakes and, instead of admitting they’re wrong, double down.

This influenced my thinking by not allowing me to simply say, “that person is evil and that’s why he does what he does.”  That line of thinking could no longer hold water.  If Milton in the 1600s could conceive that the master of evil himself could have explainable motivations, everyone could.  People have bad brain chemistry, bad genes, bad environments, or some combination of all of those and other things.  Evil actions exist, but EVIL doesn’t.  And, understanding why people do things doesn’t condone those actions but it can help us to actually solve problems.  You see, if you simply believe there is evil and some people are evil, there really isn’t anything you can do about it.  But if you understand that certain genes can increase the likelihood of someone being violent, especially when paired with certain environments, then you can actually reduce violence.  Understanding that a certain brain chemistry needs to be regulated by medicine to prevent either murder or suicide is much more helpful than simply saying “The devil made them do it.”

We all have free will, and some people do honestly choose to do bad things, but what this book taught me was that I can’t simply rush to judgement on anything without at least trying to see the other side.

That’s the great thing about good literature, you can find yourself exploring ideas that have very little to do with the original text.

Anyway, I’ve cut this short because this book actually brings up a ton of thoughts that go off in even more random directions. Also, as I mentioned in my post about blogger’s block I’ve been letting this keep me from moving forward.  So I needed to just get this out there and move on.

Hopefully, the next post comes out a bit quicker.


Leave a comment

Posted by on April 1, 2014 in Books


Bloggers Block

I get bloggers block, what I’m calling writer’s block for people who try to blog, quite often.  Usually it is a paralysis that comes from too many topics to tackle and not enough hours to write about them.  This time, however, I gave myself a series of blogs that would be about a subject that I have thought about for quite some time: The Books That Influenced Me Most.  Thought that would help keep me on track: I was wrong.

I’ve become stumped on one title.  I’ve written most of the blog, but feel I’m missing the point of its lasting influence.  The title is Paradise Lost by John Milton, and it is one of my all-time favorite books.  I’ll probably post it this weekend, but as I was writing I kept switching ideas and themes.  Which is good if I were writing a book on Paradise Lost, but not a blog post.

I know what other books are supposed to be a part of this series, so I figure I’ll write a few of them down here and maybe that will help get me going.  I’ve often heard when you have a mental block you should just push forward.  If you are blocked writing: just write.  Don’t worry about whether it’s good or not, just do it.

So that’s what this is.  Me just writing so I get something out there.

Here are some of the books I’ll feature in Joe’s Book Tour.

  • The Stranger by Albert Camus
  • Savage Inequalities by Jonathan Kozol
  • That’s Not What I Meant by Deborah Tannen
  • The Big Sleep by Raymond Chandler
  • The Evolution of Desire by David Buss
  • If on a Winter’s Night a Traveler by Italo Calvino
  • From Good to Great by Jim Collins

Hopefully the blog posts to go along with those titles will be coming soon.  Also, I may remember a few titles as I’m writing others so the list might expand.

1 Comment

Posted by on March 18, 2014 in Books


Tags: , , , ,

JBT – Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

This is the first “banned” book I ever read.  It wasn’t banned at my school, and I didn’t read it for class, but I knew that this was one of those books that certain schools banned.  I knew it was banned partly because of the use of the “n-word”, but reading it then (and then I read it again for a class on banned literature in college) I was struck by how we re-write history to make it more tolerable to ourselves.  We want to erase the n-word from the book, but then we’ll forget just how pervasive it actually was in that time period, and I fear we’ll forget how ugly the word actually is.

We live in the supposedly more enlightened time of the 21st century and people still believe horrible stereotypes about gays, blacks, Mexicans, and others.  And I believe that books, and other media, that force us to see the racist beliefs we had, and still have, in stark relief are important.  Putting this book out without the n-word allows people to think that time period was better than it was.  When we consistently make movies that show gentle slave owners who secretly supported abolition, it blinds us to the horrors of amputations, whippings, rapes, and lynchings that were a “normal” part of plantation life.

However, I understand why many would like that word erased, and this is not about defending it’s use here.  What this post is about is what this book meant to me.

The scene I remember most from this book was this one moment when Huck Finn decides that he’s going to “go to hell” rather than do what society would say is right.

Society, and the law, demands, and he was raised to believe, that Jim, as a slave, was the property of Miss Watson.  He writes a letter to her telling her where they are.  Then thinks on how nice Jim has been to him, how he’s cared for him and told him he was “the best friend old Jim ever had in the world, and the only one he’s got now” and he picks up the letter.

I took it up, and held it in my hand.  I was a-trembling, because I got to decide, forever, betwixt two things, and I knowed it.  I studied a minute, sort of holding my breath, and then says to myself:

“All right, then, I’ll go to hell” – and I tore it up.

- page 207 from the Signet Classic Edition

That section has stuck with me all these years.  In preparing for this post I picked up my old copy of Huck Finn and I had a faded bookmark between those pages.  I read this book first in Junior High and that was the moment that I realized that sometimes the popular opinion my not be the right opinion.  That society as a whole could be wrong.  That laws themselves might be unjust.  That what you’ve been told all your life, might be wrong.

I was raised Catholic.  Sin is a real thing.  Eternal damnation is a real thing.  Yet, I cannot conceive to even believe that homosexuality is a sin.  That two people who seek to do nothing more than love one another, would be eternally damned to a lake of hellfire.

I, of course, also became an atheist so it’s not like religion guides my thoughts much, but it’s just another example of how I decided between what I was told to be true, and what I feel to be right.

I, like most people, would like to believe I’d have been an abolitionist if I lived during the Civil War era.  Considering I live in a theist society and claim atheism, I’m probably right.  I grew up in the patriarchal machismo south Texas and support Gay Rights and consider myself a feminist, so the odds are probably better than average I’d buck the system.

So that’s how the book influenced me.  It presented a time when people, a large swath of society, said one thing was right, true, and just, and the book counters, “Just because everyone is heading one direction, doesn’t mean it’s the right direction.”

As a historical artifact I also feel it’s necessary.  There’s a moment when Jim is talking about what he’ll do when free and talks of saving up money to purchase his wife back, and try to buy back his children, or steal them back if the slaver won’t sell them.  Huck Finn reacts with shock that Jim would speak so boldly, not with shock that he must try and purchase back his family.  That society is what Mr. Twain (or Clemens if you prefer) hoped we’d never go back to again.  A society that is shocked by speaking out against evil, rather than the evil itself.

That too is why this book is on this list.  The evils we must speak out against today may not rise to the level of slavery, but they are no less important to speak out against.  There may never be a time period where someone isn’t being oppressed or having their rights stripped, heck states are suppressing voting rights and it’s 2014!  2014 people!  So we must continue to speak out when required, and choose to “go to hell” rather than do what “society” says is right.

Thank you Mr. Twain for teaching a young boy that lesson.

1 Comment

Posted by on February 25, 2014 in Books


Tags: , ,

Week off

I took a week off of the book tour because I went to lovely Playa del Carmen (near Cancun in Mexico). It was 90% business but the 10% fun was awesome. And since I enjoy my business, it was probably more like 100 percent fun. Such a great time and such great people. More energized than ever for the coming year. It’s going to be an amazing 2014.

Leave a comment

Posted by on February 22, 2014 in Random


Diabetes Update

I meant to post this update earlier, but just kept putting it off.  Back at the beginning of October I was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes.  3 months later my glucose levels are practically normal.  I went from risk of everything bad  associated with diabetes, to “you should be totally fine as long as you keep up the good work”.

By the numbers:

Before: glucose 239 mg/dL
After: glucose 104
Normal (65 – 100)
Triglycerides: you don’t even want to know
After 119
Normal < 150
Before: Hemoglobin A1c 8.5%
After: Hemoglobin A1c 6%
Normal: (4.0 – 5.6)

It’s Just a Problem I Need to Solve

I did all that in 3 months.  I lost 20 pounds, feel better than I ever have in my life, dropped down to a size 32in waist in jeans (still tight, but give me a few more weeks) size medium in t-shirts (holy crap I haven’t worn those in years) and the ability to do more pull-ups than I ever have in my entire life (I’m not giving you the number because it’s still a ridiculously small amount).

How did I do this?  I just changed my diet and kept exercising.  I broke the problem down into 3 distinct goals that I gave myself 6 months to achieve.  I did that because I’m supposed to get my blood work done every three months (though after this next test I may be able to only have it done every 6 months – if I keep the numbers down).  For the first 3 months the goal was eliminate drinking, breads, and keep sugar under 35g per day.

Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a comment

Posted by on February 13, 2014 in Random


Tags: , , ,

JBT – Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

Frankenstein – The Modern Prometheus

This is the cover I most associate with Frankenstein.

This is the cover I most associate with Frankenstein.

I read too many books to reread a book very often, but Frankenstein I have read at least 4 times.  I say at least, because I know I read it first in jr. high (for fun), then again in high school (for which I wrote a paper), then for two different classes in college (for which I wrote two other papers).  I think I may have read it another time for fun, but I can’t remember for sure.  If I had to pick a favorite book, this would probably be the closest thing to one.  There are only a few other books which I’ve read more than once (and they each appear on this list).

What I love about this book, and literature in general, is that it’s open to so many different interpretations, and at each point in my life it meant something different.  When I first read it in junior high, it opened up to me the idea that “truth” could be gained by reading.  That the world could believe something, and think they’re completely right, but be completely wrong.  That the media could so shape a person’s point of view, that it could distort reality.

I’m talking, of course, about the movie and popular perception of Frankenstein as the green, lumbering, monster with bolts in it’s neck and the inability to string two words together.

The Book Was Better

Granted, the media image of Frankenstein’s monster has changed (as have the media representations of vampires, werewolves, etc), but back in *cough* *cough* the 1980s *cough* this wasn’t the case.  When I first read this book I was amazed at how different the movie was from the book (which set me up to not expect movies and books to share much in common in the future).  But from a purely mind-blowing experience, I was amazed that I, some adolescent, had knowledge that many adults did not have.  I KNEW MORE THAN ADULTS! Further, I got this knowledge by reading.

That’s a freaky experience.  I don’t think it was the first time I realized that adults didn’t know everything, but I do think it was the first time I realized that they could have beliefs that were not based on “reality” (it’s a book so it’s not technically real).  This lead me to read a lot of other classic works of science fiction to see what else I’d been “lied to” about.

Emotional Maturity

As I mentioned there are a lot of different ways to interpret the text: what it says about appearance and how people judge others, what it says about the role of science & ethics, and the dangers of man playing god, man’s relationship with God and how we feel we’ve been forsaken, etc.

The idea I most associate now with the novel is one of immaturity.  Frankenstein’s monster is, chronologically, a child  albeit in the body of a full grown adult.  As such, it may be able to speak quite eloquently, but emotionally it still responds as a child.

I don’t have kids, but I remember being one.  When I was punished for something I did wrong I didn’t say, “I DISAGREE WITH YOUR ASSESSMENT OF MY ACTIONS, BUT RESPECT YOUR IDEAS!  I WILL NOW GO TO MY ROOM AND FORMULATE AN APPROPRIATE REBUTTAL!”

No, what I, and many teens and kids say is, “I HATE YOU!”

We do this because we lack emotional maturity and we’re affected by hormones.  So too is Frankenstein’s monster.  There exists only a dichotomy of thought: hate/love, life/death, with/against.  There exist no gray areas.  That is how a child sees the world.  Being an adult means living in the gray areas.  Working at jobs you don’t like, so that you can earn money, experience, etc so that you can eventually do what you love.

The problem is that Frankenstein himself lacks this maturity.  He creates with thinking of the consequences.  He destroys without thinking of the consequences.  He reacts to his actions as if they happened to him, rather than he caused them.

These ideas have stuck with me and force me to consider my own ideas through the prism of: am I oversimplifying a complex issue.  Am I forcing gray to be either black or white.  Am I saying, “I’m right and you’re wrong”, and ending debate prematurely.

It’s been 10+ years since I last read the book, and I’m probably going to read it again soon, but it’s still something I think on every now and then.  Especially politics and the false dichotomies they force us into.  Also, how media can shape a person’s point of view and distort reality.  I firmly believe if I hadn’t encountered Frankenstein as a kid, I wouldn’t be as skeptical of the media and what I’m told as I am.

So, for making me media savvy, teaching me to look at original sources before believing something, and forcing me to resist knee-jerk emotional responses (many times unsuccessfully – but I’m trying) I thank you Mary Shelley for writing Frankenstein.

Leave a comment

Posted by on February 10, 2014 in Books


Tags: , , , , ,


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 181 other followers